Endangered Childen and Community Conscience
There has been great debate throughout our nation concerning what shall be done with the hundreds of unaccompanied children who have in recent weeks crossed our border, seeking a refuge from the chaos and violence to which they were subjected in the homes in Central America. Their parents sent them on that dangerous trek to the United States because they knew that if their children did not flee, more than likely, their children would wind up the victims of brutality, rape, and murder. Today our country is divided between those who wish to welcome and protect these children and those who see them an placing an unacceptable burden upon our country’s resources and wish to send them back to from whence they came.
About two weeks ago, Bill Gluba, the Mayor of Davenport, Iowa – my community – put forth a proposal to bring some of these children to our city. Not surprisingly, the response to that proposal was mixed, marking us as a microcosm of the national debate. There were those who gathered to plan on how we could best welcome these children, while there were those, including some alderman of our city council, who expressed there determination to keep them out of our town. One alderman, on national TV, proclaimed his intention to stand in the middle of the street, blocking any bus carrying such children from entering within our city limits.
As those who know me can well imagine, I stand on the side of welcoming the children. To that end, I have joined with other community clergy who are planning an event meant to declare an interfaith message of support for opening our doors to these young refugees.
Five days ago, I submitted an Opinion Page letter to the Quad City Times, expressing my particular perspective and feelings on the matter. So far, my letter has not appeared in print or on their website. They may yet publish it or they may never publish it. I suspect that they have received many letters and cannot begin to publish them all. Still, I want my voice to be heard, even if the audience is not nearly as large or as locally focused as it would be in our local paper. Therefore, I have decided to share the text of this letter here in my blog. While it speaks specifically to the question of whether or not the Quad Cities should open its doors and welcome these children, it also can be understood to address whether our nation itself should open its doors and welcome these children, declaring them “official” refugees from grave danger and persecution. Here is what I wrote:
Prior to the outbreak of World War II, when the specter of the Holocaust loomed ever greater in Europe, and the borders of the free world were generally closed to Jews seeking to flee the coming destruction, there was one small ray of hope. That ray radiated out of England. While England, like the United States, would not open its doors to the endangered Jews, it did decide to open its doors to Jewish children. Boatload after boatload of Jewish children landed on British shores. With many tears and great anguish, their parents sent them away, knowing that they might never see them again, so that these children might not die at the hands of the Nazis. This valiant effort to save the children was called “Kindertransport” and it came to an abrupt end when England entered the war.
Holocaust analogies can easily be overplayed but sometimes they are truly appropriate. This is such an occasion. Today on our southern border there are amassed a large number of unaccompanied children from Central America who have been sent to our country by their parents, seeking asylum. Their parents, with broken hearts, sent them away because could not stand idly by while their children would have been beaten, raped, and killed. Like with the Kindertransport, these parents made an extremely hard choice in order to save their children’s lives.
Today, we in the Quad Cities are faced with a choice as well. Will we, like the people of England, open our doors and our hearts to these refugee children, or will we, like so many other nations back in the ‘30’s, choose to slam our doors shut on them and in so doing, condemn them to cruel suffering and death? In the years to come, which choice will we be better able to live with?
This entry was posted on July 27, 2014 at 5:05 pm and is filed under America, Children in the Holocaust, Clergy, Davenport City Council, Giving of Ourselves, Great Britain, Holocaust, hope, Immigration to America, Interfaith Relations, Iowa, Kindertransport, Mayor Bill Gluba of Davenport, Quad Cities, Quad City Times, Responsibility of the Citizens for the Sins of the Nation in a Democracy, Social Action, Social Justice, Tikkun Olam, Uncategorized, United States, US Social Issues. You can subscribe via RSS 2.0 feed to this post's comments.
Tags: America, children, Children in the Holocaust, Clergy, Davenport City Council, Giving of Ourselves, Great Britain, Holocaust, hope, immigration to America, Interfaith Relations, Iowa, Kindertransport, Mayor Bill Gluba of Davenport, Quad Cities, Quad City Times, Responsibility of the Citizens for the Sins of the Nation in a Democracy, Shared Faith Values, Social Action, Social Justice, Tikkun Olam, unaccompanied children, United States, US Social IssuesYou can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.